prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement
  Download
PDF 152.69 KB
Other - Review
Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement
IPF Notes, 17 (2024), 137; 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3326/in.2024.137
Bronić, Mihaela; Franić, Josip

Cite this document

Bronić, M. & Franić, J. (2024). Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement. IPF Notes, 17. (137), 1-6. doi: 10.3326/in.2024.137

Bronić, Mihaela and Josip Franić. "Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement." IPF Notes, vol. 17, no. 137, 2024, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3326/in.2024.137

Bronić, Mihaela and Josip Franić. "Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement." IPF Notes 17, no. 137 (2024): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3326/in.2024.137

Bronić, M. and Franić, J. (2024) 'Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement', IPF Notes, 17(137), pp. 1-6. doi: 10.3326/in.2024.137

Bronić M, Franić J. Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement. IPF Notes [Internet]. 2024 June 14 [cited 2024 November 13];17(137):1-6. doi: 10.3326/in.2024.137

M. Bronić and J. Franić, "Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement", IPF Notes, vol. 17, no. 137, pp. 1-6, June 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:242:774521. [Accessed: 13 November 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Central government budget transparency: Croatia with much room for improvement
AuthorMihaela Bronić
AuthorJosip Franić
Author's institutionInstitute of Public Finance
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Economics
Abstract (english)
The most recent round of research conducted by the International Budget Partnership (IBP) on central government budget transparency sees Croatia scoring 67 points (out of a maximum of 100), ranking 24th out of the 125 countries included in the analysis. Even though this score is three points higher than in the previous research round (2021), there is still substantial room for improvement, not only with regard to publishing timely and intelligible information on the collection and spending of budget funds, but also with regard to including the public in budget-related processes.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeOther - Review
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleIPF Notes
Numberingvol. 17, no. 137, pp. 1-6
e-ISSN2787-7639
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3326/in.2024.137
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:242:774521
Publication2024-06-14
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) icon
Created on2024-06-14 10:40:05